Total Commodity Programs in Mendocino County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $8,301,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walter Stornetta Ranch | Manchester, CA 95459 | $405,399 |
2 | Kl Barr LLC | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $253,156 |
3 | Pauli Ranch | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $250,000 |
4 | Windy Hollow Dba Del Mar Farms | Manchester, CA 95459 | $237,497 |
5 | Brutocao Vineyards | Hopland, CA 95449 | $224,307 |
6 | Charles Vau | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $203,958 |
7 | Frey Vineyards, Ltd. | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $179,403 |
8 | Hildreth Farms Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $165,323 |
9 | Pink Sands, Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $164,111 |
10 | Ruddick Ranch Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $154,694 |
11 | Johnson Family Ranch, Inc. | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $154,059 |
12 | Redwood Empire Packing Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $139,267 |
13 | Nelson And Sons Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $138,514 |
14 | Kurt W Ashurst Shadowbrook Farms | Hopland, CA 95449 | $137,536 |
15 | Eugene J M Mcfadden | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $135,417 |
16 | Middleridge Vineyards | Hopland, CA 95449 | $129,868 |
17 | Navarro Ranch LLC | Philo, CA 95466 | $123,013 |
18 | John Serres | Willits, CA 95490 | $113,382 |
19 | Estes Fisheries, Inc | Fort Bragg, CA 95437 | $99,179 |
20 | Alder Springs Vineyard And Alder | Belvedere Tiburon, CA 94920 | $95,479 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>