Direct Payment Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,286
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $79,458,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,175,200 |
2 | Roduner Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,199,860 |
3 | A-bar Ag Enterprises | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,384,160 |
4 | Teixeira And Sons | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,364,108 |
5 | Wl Goodman & Sons | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,116,039 |
6 | Gilardi Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,100,344 |
7 | Brookhurst Farms Gp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $1,050,722 |
8 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,027,635 |
9 | Gallo Farming Company | Atwater, CA 95301 | $1,004,684 |
10 | Double Diamond Dairy & Ranch | El Nido, CA 95317 | $967,564 |
11 | Barcellos Et Al | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $862,171 |
12 | Favier Farms | Atwater, CA 95301 | $854,259 |
13 | Edward And Nancy Silva | El Nido, CA 95317 | $853,604 |
14 | David Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $850,132 |
15 | Frenchy's Trucking | Merced, CA 95341 | $795,565 |
16 | Gamboni Farming Co | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $733,261 |
17 | Pentagon Company | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $722,871 |
18 | O'banion Ranches | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $717,901 |
19 | John & Vicky Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $702,004 |
20 | David And Peggy Farmer Jv | El Nido, CA 95317 | $695,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>