Water Bank Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 43
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $212,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hollister L&c C/o Louis Serratto | Daly City, CA 94015 | $25,430 |
| 2 | Gustine Land & Cattle Inc | Soquel, CA 95073 | $17,648 |
| 3 | Salinas Land & Cattle Inc. | Salinas, CA 93902 | $16,934 |
| 4 | Lonetree Land & Cattle Inc | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $10,798 |
| 5 | Gables Land & Cattle | Fresno, CA 93720 | $9,901 |
| 6 | Big Water Land Co Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,408 |
| 7 | Bowles Farming Company Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $8,763 |
| 8 | Klamath L & C Inc | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $6,963 |
| 9 | Stillbow Ranch Inc | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $6,307 |
| 10 | Bardin Duck Club | Salinas, CA 93912 | $5,558 |
| 11 | E Gustine Dk Cl | Santa Cruz, CA 95062 | $5,240 |
| 12 | Reeves Lake Land Co | Fresno, CA 93720 | $4,626 |
| 13 | Double D L&c | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $4,359 |
| 14 | Three Rivers Ranch Ptnshp | Fresno, CA 93728 | $4,220 |
| 15 | Chester N Vogt | Elk Creek, CA 95939 | $4,200 |
| 16 | Eureka Farms Duck Club Jv | Soquel, CA 95073 | $3,892 |
| 17 | Lucky 12 Duck Club | Mountain View, CA 94040 | $3,830 |
| 18 | Riverfield Cattle Co Inc | San Marino, CA 91108 | $3,752 |
| 19 | Mesquite Sportsmens Club | Fresno, CA 93703 | $3,634 |
| 20 | Coaches Gun Club Inc | Fresno, CA 93710 | $3,629 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf