Conservation Reserve Program in Monterey County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 146
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $7,164,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Ray E Harden | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $100,381 |
| 22 | John O Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $99,747 |
| 23 | Camany Family Trust | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $91,454 |
| 24 | Vineyard Wildlife Ranch LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $91,385 |
| 25 | Thelma Sinclair Family Rt | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $85,473 |
| 26 | Augusta Inc | Corning, NY 14830 | $85,407 |
| 27 | Robert J Laughlin Jr | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $78,520 |
| 28 | Oak Creek Apple Ranch Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $78,332 |
| 29 | Estate Of Ardelia Work | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $75,920 |
| 30 | William L Whitney | King City, CA 93930 | $75,539 |
| 31 | Marvin C Amery | Bradley, CA 93426 | $73,169 |
| 32 | Wilbert Atkins Rt | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $71,784 |
| 33 | Emma Iarussi Revocable Trust | Austin, TX 78703 | $66,374 |
| 34 | Miller Bros Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $65,466 |
| 35 | William J Clark | King City, CA 93930 | $65,208 |
| 36 | Michel J Orradre Rt | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $62,350 |
| 37 | Ben R Work | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $60,888 |
| 38 | Delmar Deis Revocable Trust | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $54,517 |
| 39 | Doris Harden Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $46,528 |
| 40 | Richard Sinclair Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $41,261 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf