Total Commodity Programs in Napa County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 267
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Napa County, California totaled $12,722,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chateau Montelena LLC | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $500,000 |
2 | C.p. Family Partnership, L.p. | Napa, CA 94559 | $298,261 |
3 | Renteria Oakville Estate LLC | Napa, CA 94559 | $256,203 |
4 | Frediani Vineyards LLC | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $254,876 |
5 | Peter R Mondavi Family Limited Partnership | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $250,146 |
6 | Kenneth E And Gail Laird Revocable Trust - Kenneth | Napa, CA 94558 | $250,000 |
7 | Spottswoode Winery Inc | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $250,000 |
8 | Stewart Cellars LLC | Rutherford, CA 94573 | $239,476 |
9 | Edcora Vineyard LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $235,453 |
10 | Anthony M Truchard | Napa, CA 94559 | $231,376 |
11 | Craig Battuello Family Vineyards II LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $215,726 |
12 | Chappellet Vineyard LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $212,906 |
13 | Mvp Vineyard LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $182,211 |
14 | Dunnigan Hills | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $178,155 |
15 | Rancho Chimiles Limited Partnership | Napa, CA 94558 | $171,747 |
16 | Imgod LLC | Napa, CA 94559 | $161,479 |
17 | Francis Mahoney | Napa, CA 94559 | $158,916 |
18 | Urv, LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $154,933 |
19 | William H Hill | Napa, CA 94558 | $152,248 |
20 | Mondavi Family Partners LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $150,254 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>