Farm Subsidy information
Nevada County, California
Total Subsidies in Nevada County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 127
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nevada County, California totaled $1,679,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James Edward Gates | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $95,656 |
2 | David Bartow | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $85,467 |
3 | Indian Springs Vineyards | Penn Valley, CA 95946 | $74,536 |
4 | Dolores Sanford | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $67,800 |
5 | Auburn Ravine Ranch Inc | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $51,033 |
6 | Bierwagen Ent Dba Donner Trail Fr | Chicago Park, CA 95712 | $42,095 |
7 | David Bradley | Calpine, CA 96124 | $36,656 |
8 | Alana Fowler | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $35,794 |
9 | Michael Blagg | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $31,508 |
10 | James A Bratt | North San Juan, CA 95960 | $31,210 |
11 | Robinson & Sons | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $29,276 |
12 | Fred Langdon | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $25,525 |
13 | Optimist Foundation Inc | Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 | $24,759 |
14 | John Reader | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $24,579 |
15 | Marcus R Mena | Grass Valley, CA 95945 | $22,007 |
16 | John Paye | Grass Valley, CA 95945 | $21,875 |
17 | Antonio Garza | Penn Valley, CA 95946 | $21,551 |
18 | George C Bierwagen | Chicago Park, CA 95712 | $20,565 |
19 | Ronald D Youngman | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $19,439 |
20 | Ronald Knaus | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $19,265 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>