Farm Subsidy information
Riverside County, California
Total Subsidies in Riverside County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 81
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $9,247,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Goyenetche Dairy No 2 | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $107,103 |
22 | Van Dyke Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $106,826 |
23 | John Bootsma Dairy | Lakeview, CA 92567 | $106,773 |
24 | Scott Bros Dairy Farms Lp | Moreno Valley, CA 92555 | $106,390 |
25 | Chuchian Inc | Coachella, CA 92236 | $96,417 |
26 | Jim Bootsma Jr Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92581 | $95,004 |
27 | William Koot Dairy | Winchester, CA 92596 | $91,620 |
28 | Oostdam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $78,024 |
29 | O & S Holsteins Lp | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $76,796 |
30 | Boersma Dairy | Winchester, CA 92596 | $75,578 |
31 | Zeiders And Sons | Sun City, CA 92584 | $75,509 |
32 | Five Safe T LLC | Los Angeles, CA 90049 | $74,605 |
33 | Chris Lankford | Five Points, CA 93624 | $74,137 |
34 | Pedro Ma Indacochea | Wildomar, CA 92595 | $70,967 |
35 | Hollandia Farms North | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $69,726 |
36 | East West Unlimited LLC | Coachella, CA 92236 | $69,417 |
37 | Rancho Casa Loma Inc | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $63,873 |
38 | Dick Van Dam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $56,889 |
39 | Jim Bootsma Jr | San Jacinto, CA 92581 | $55,680 |
40 | Pastime Lakes Holdings LLC | Nuevo, CA 92567 | $52,091 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”