Farm Subsidy information
Riverside County, California
Total Subsidies in Riverside County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 229
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $42,177,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sun And Sands Enterprises, LLC | Coachella, CA 92236 | $1,485,625 |
| 2 | Marvo Holsteins Dairy | Lakeview, CA 92567 | $1,453,993 |
| 3 | Riverbed Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92583 | $1,436,503 |
| 4 | Oostdam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $1,193,048 |
| 5 | Cocopah Nurseries Inc | Indio, CA 92201 | $1,191,747 |
| 6 | Red River Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $1,022,408 |
| 7 | Belk Farms LLC | Coachella, CA 92236 | $1,000,000 |
| 8 | Amazing Coachella Inc | Coachella, CA 92236 | $1,000,000 |
| 9 | Dyt Dairy | Eastvale, CA 92880 | $929,753 |
| 10 | Dica Ranches | Mecca, CA 92254 | $916,641 |
| 11 | Cottonwood Dairy LLC | Norco, CA 92860 | $910,634 |
| 12 | John Bootsma Dairy | Lakeview, CA 92567 | $876,452 |
| 13 | Rio Rancho 2005 Bryce Partnership | Blythe, CA 92226 | $850,535 |
| 14 | Scott Bros Dairy Farms Lp | Moreno Valley, CA 92555 | $832,940 |
| 15 | Ramona Dairy, LLC | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $790,974 |
| 16 | Dick Van Dam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $788,346 |
| 17 | Hadley Date Gardens, Inc | Thermal, CA 92274 | $750,000 |
| 18 | Sultan Ranches LLC | Mecca, CA 92254 | $736,530 |
| 19 | O & S Holsteins Lp | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $712,305 |
| 20 | Mecca Star Ranches | Mecca, CA 92254 | $667,552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf