Farm Subsidy information
Sacramento County, California
Total Subsidies in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,493
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $207,238,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Steyn Dairy | Galt, CA 95632 | $2,899,373 |
2 | Van Warmerdam Dairy Inc | Galt, CA 95632 | $2,513,847 |
3 | B & J Dairy Lp | Galt, CA 95632 | $2,392,104 |
4 | Klm Ranches Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $2,054,838 |
5 | Natomas Growers | Sacramento, CA 95831 | $1,764,898 |
6 | Gary Silva Sr | Herald, CA 95638 | $1,759,369 |
7 | Wackman Ranch | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,688,349 |
8 | Mello Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $1,681,479 |
9 | Lowrey Cattle And Farming | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $1,557,986 |
10 | Mcenerney & Sons | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,540,378 |
11 | Amistad Ranches | Courtland, CA 95615 | $1,488,939 |
12 | Tony Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,487,965 |
13 | Joe M Simoes & Sons Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,356,179 |
14 | Johnson Farms | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,338,545 |
15 | New Hope Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,313,169 |
16 | Joe Sanchez Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $1,306,094 |
17 | Chavier Farming | Isleton, CA 95641 | $1,226,052 |
18 | Cal-denier Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,194,427 |
19 | Sodbuster Farms | Herald, CA 95638 | $1,150,640 |
20 | Grizzly Creek Properties Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $1,132,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>