Miscellaneous Farm Programs in San Benito County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $333,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William Freitas & Son Inc | Hollister, CA 95023 | $141,904 |
2 | Perry Orchards Inc | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $56,732 |
3 | Anthony Botelho | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $49,253 |
4 | Lavagnino Ranches | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $39,985 |
5 | Anthony Freitas | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $19,910 |
6 | Doris Sabatino | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $14,829 |
7 | Louis Freitas Jr | Hollister, CA 95023 | $4,837 |
8 | Scott Rouhier | Aromas, CA 95004 | $3,166 |
9 | Milton Sylva | Hollister, CA 95023 | $1,373 |
10 | Albert G De Rosa | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $978 |
11 | Casa De Fruta Orchards | Hollister, CA 95023 | $229 |
12 | Stirewalt Farm And Truck | Hollister, CA 95023 | $74 |
13 | Three-way Farms | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $55 |
14 | Emama Mar Eshai Shimun | Hollister, CA 95023 | $31 |
15 | Scagliotti Farms | Hollister, CA 95023 | $22 |
16 | San Juan Orchard Partners | Carmel Valley, CA 93924 | $16 |
17 | Peterson Land & Cattle | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $14 |
18 | Greg Renz Dba Agco Hay Company | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $10 |
19 | Albert Silva | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $10 |
20 | Lea Pereira | Hollister, CA 95023 | $10 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>