Loan Deficiency in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 554
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $13,289,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Delta Wetlands Properties | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $802,752 |
2 | Jack Klein Trust Ptrshp | Stockton, CA 95267 | $588,491 |
3 | M & T Staten Ranch | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $484,380 |
4 | Hwy 12 Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95219 | $329,887 |
5 | Del Rio Partners | Lodi, CA 95242 | $327,039 |
6 | David Robertson | Linden, CA 95236 | $261,026 |
7 | Leisha Robertson | Linden, CA 95236 | $245,158 |
8 | E & A Biscaia | Thornton, CA 95686 | $239,033 |
9 | Stella Farms | Stockton, CA 95206 | $195,724 |
10 | Muzio Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $192,101 |
11 | Lagorio Properties Lp | Stockton, CA 95203 | $167,908 |
12 | George Biagi Jr | Stockton, CA 95219 | $167,783 |
13 | H Milton Heins | Stockton, CA 95219 | $157,309 |
14 | Fildin Development Co | Lodi, CA 95242 | $155,485 |
15 | George Te Velde Jr - The Te Velde Survivor's Trust | Modesto, CA 95356 | $150,718 |
16 | G Biagi Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95219 | $141,170 |
17 | Venice Island Inc | Lodi, CA 95242 | $140,909 |
18 | John Spaletta Ranch Inc | Lodi, CA 95242 | $133,199 |
19 | E & E Company | Stockton, CA 95204 | $132,434 |
20 | Watanabe Bros Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $124,250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>