Total Commodity Programs in San Joaquin County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,338
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $86,369,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vander Schaaf Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $1,879,588 |
2 | Machado Dairy Farms | Manteca, CA 95337 | $1,081,201 |
3 | Seifert Dairy II Lp | Acampo, CA 95220 | $1,056,470 |
4 | Raymond & Susanne Quaresma Dairy | Manteca, CA 95337 | $1,052,503 |
5 | Brittalia Ventures Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $949,322 |
6 | R L Kamps Inc | Ripon, CA 95366 | $897,919 |
7 | Wagner Dairy Gp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $887,530 |
8 | Manuel & Jeannette Borges Dairy Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $858,265 |
9 | Manuel & Maria Silva Dairy | Stockton, CA 95215 | $836,539 |
10 | Ed Thoming & Sons Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $825,614 |
11 | Dutra Farms Inc | Manteca, CA 95337 | $796,401 |
12 | Ed Nunes Dairy Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $781,360 |
13 | Roche Bros Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $760,582 |
14 | Carna Farming | Linden, CA 95236 | $750,000 |
15 | Ashley Lane Lp | Linden, CA 95236 | $723,570 |
16 | Lima Ranch | Lodi, CA 95242 | $714,771 |
17 | Temple Creek Dairy Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $712,954 |
18 | Lawrence Sambado | Linden, CA 95236 | $701,178 |
19 | John Dondero Farms Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $667,078 |
20 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $634,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>