Farm Subsidy information

San Luis Obispo County, California

Total Subsidies in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,171

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $242,940,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1White Ranch CompanyShandon, CA 93461$5,084,089
2L Y 7 CompanySanta Margarita, CA 93453$3,190,129
3Twisselman/clarkShandon, CA 93461$2,309,910
4Sill Properties IncBakersfield, CA 93301$2,277,186
5Lacey LivestockPaso Robles, CA 93447$2,218,086
6Robert K MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$2,100,142
7Charles W. Kuhnle And SonsSanta Margarita, CA 93453$2,081,946
8Clark BrothersPaso Robles, CA 93446$2,015,687
9K W RanchSanta Margarita, CA 93453$1,999,725
10Johansing Farms LLCSan Miguel, CA 93451$1,755,107
11Bitterwater Land & CattlePaso Robles, CA 93446$1,730,609
12Michael R StroussPaso Robles, CA 93446$1,721,820
13Diane MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$1,555,007
14Twisselman Grain And CattleShandon, CA 93461$1,446,031
15Ronald HodelPaso Robles, CA 93446$1,138,847
16Rowland TwisselmanSanta Margarita, CA 93453$1,115,912
17Lonnie TwisselmanShandon, CA 93461$1,017,430
18Carrie A Peck TrustFresno, CA 93720$1,007,852
19Wilson Ranches IncTempleton, CA 93465$994,501
20Kenneth Eng JrSan Antonio, TX 78229$992,540

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag