Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 436
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $15,194,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sill Properties Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93301 | $673,132 |
| 2 | Dohi Farms | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $500,000 |
| 3 | Holland America Flowers, LLC | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $500,000 |
| 4 | Innovative Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $498,394 |
| 5 | We Love Berries, LLC | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $333,143 |
| 6 | Margarita Vineyards LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $327,145 |
| 7 | S Kobara And Sons | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $300,624 |
| 8 | Hammond Vineyards Lp | Visalia, CA 93291 | $281,951 |
| 9 | Freshway Farms, LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $275,000 |
| 10 | San Ysidro Farms, Inc | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $251,550 |
| 11 | Guerra Ranch Corp | Morro Bay, CA 93443 | $250,000 |
| 12 | Alegre Farms Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $250,000 |
| 13 | Oceano Packing Co LLC | Pismo Beach, CA 93448 | $250,000 |
| 14 | Ljt Flowers Inc Dba Skyline Flowe | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $250,000 |
| 15 | Carol Perrett | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $250,000 |
| 16 | H D Perrett | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $250,000 |
| 17 | Okui Farms LLC | Oceano, CA 93475 | $250,000 |
| 18 | Koch Mesa Nursery, Inc. Dba Euflo | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $245,747 |
| 19 | Michael Mills | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $243,548 |
| 20 | Rick Machado | Shandon, CA 93461 | $236,885 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf