Livestock Forage Disaster Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 116
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $235,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $14,425 |
| 2 | Massey Davis Livestock | Templeton, CA 93465 | $13,226 |
| 3 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $11,635 |
| 4 | Justin Rhoades | Cambria, CA 93428 | $9,251 |
| 5 | Simonin Livestock Gp | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $7,907 |
| 6 | Green Valley Cattle Company Lp | Cambria, CA 93428 | $7,869 |
| 7 | J B Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $7,353 |
| 8 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $5,339 |
| 9 | Justin Garcin | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $4,689 |
| 10 | Michael Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $4,676 |
| 11 | Avenales Cattle Co | Shandon, CA 93461 | $4,622 |
| 12 | Jon Pedotti | Cambria, CA 93428 | $4,486 |
| 13 | Molnar Cattle LLC | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $3,975 |
| 14 | J & V Sill Family Trust | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $3,916 |
| 15 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,825 |
| 16 | Robert Soto | Cambria, CA 93428 | $3,806 |
| 17 | Wineman Ranch | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $3,803 |
| 18 | Ruffoni Brothers | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $3,801 |
| 19 | Richard L Nock | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $3,656 |
| 20 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf