Non-insured Disaster Assistance in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $217,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antonio Chavez Revocable Trust | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $102,396 |
| 2 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $19,825 |
| 3 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $16,645 |
| 4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $13,499 |
| 5 | Caliente Management Company LLC | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $12,640 |
| 6 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $10,671 |
| 7 | Humberto De La Paz | Grover Beach, CA 93483 | $10,485 |
| 8 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $6,411 |
| 9 | Humberto Ponce Rodriguez | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $5,143 |
| 10 | Raul Taborga | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $4,799 |
| 11 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,064 |
| 12 | A B Turri Co | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $2,031 |
| 13 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,482 |
| 14 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,482 |
| 15 | Wagster Ag Services LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,405 |
| 16 | Justin Garcin | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $1,199 |
| 17 | John M Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,073 |
| 18 | Green Valley Cattle Company Lp | Cambria, CA 93428 | $976 |
| 19 | El Rancho Espanol De Cuyama, No. 1, LLC | New Cuyama, CA 93254 | $694 |
| 20 | Larry Brooks | Shandon, CA 93461 | $585 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf