Farm Subsidy information
San Luis Obispo County, California
Total Subsidies in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 260
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $7,302,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $45,229 |
| 22 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $42,571 |
| 23 | Serine-cannonau Vineyard Corp | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $42,379 |
| 24 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $41,654 |
| 25 | Mitch Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,954 |
| 26 | Kelly Miller Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,942 |
| 27 | Stacy Miller Bonnifield | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,942 |
| 28 | C R Grant Ranch LLC | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $37,371 |
| 29 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $37,305 |
| 30 | Johansing Farms LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $36,320 |
| 31 | Ernst Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $35,501 |
| 32 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $34,617 |
| 33 | Carly Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,663 |
| 34 | Garrett Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,663 |
| 35 | Jacob Beckett | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $30,382 |
| 36 | Jaureguy Land Trust Dated December 29 1995 | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $29,708 |
| 37 | Cal Poly Corporation | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | $25,412 |
| 38 | Timothy Testerman | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $25,379 |
| 39 | Wilson Ranches Inc | Templeton, CA 93465 | $25,180 |
| 40 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $24,051 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf