Conservation Reserve Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 71
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,154,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $121,997 |
| 2 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $55,470 |
| 3 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $50,000 |
| 4 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $46,960 |
| 5 | Cheryl Skelton Seperate Property Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $46,423 |
| 6 | Darrell Skelton Seperate Property Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $46,423 |
| 7 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $43,712 |
| 8 | Michael Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $37,804 |
| 9 | Ernst Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $35,501 |
| 10 | Joseph D Kuhnle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $35,090 |
| 11 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $34,768 |
| 12 | C R Grant Ranch LLC | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $34,466 |
| 13 | Ronald Hodel | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $34,094 |
| 14 | Junis Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $31,493 |
| 15 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $31,493 |
| 16 | Jaureguy Land Trust Dated December 29 1995 | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $29,708 |
| 17 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $23,616 |
| 18 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $23,130 |
| 19 | Mckee Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $22,774 |
| 20 | Carly Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $21,855 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf