Loan Deficiency in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $1,199,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $211,015 |
| 2 | Twisselman/clark | Shandon, CA 93461 | $162,980 |
| 3 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $102,124 |
| 4 | Rinconada Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $68,383 |
| 5 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $68,061 |
| 6 | J B Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $59,913 |
| 7 | Martin Martin Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $39,718 |
| 8 | Robert Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $37,325 |
| 9 | Jaureguy Family Trust No 1 | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $26,755 |
| 10 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $25,967 |
| 11 | Loren Mcwilliams | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $21,169 |
| 12 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $19,588 |
| 13 | Larry Ravera | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $18,822 |
| 14 | Wilson Ranches Inc | Templeton, CA 93465 | $18,754 |
| 15 | Marie Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $16,095 |
| 16 | Robert Rohrer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $14,363 |
| 17 | Lahargou Farming | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $13,559 |
| 18 | Terry Brazil | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $11,533 |
| 19 | John W Richardson | Agoura Hills, CA 91301 | $11,532 |
| 20 | Jon P Cagliero | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $11,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf