Environmental Quality Incentives Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $553,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Scott Mather | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $9,000 |
22 | Stephen Martin | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $8,742 |
23 | Lenet Ranch | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $8,325 |
24 | Santa Margarita Ranch LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $8,138 |
25 | Larry E Fiscalini | Cambria, CA 93428 | $7,116 |
26 | Wayne R Adams | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $6,385 |
27 | Ian Irving Mcmillan II | Shandon, CA 93461 | $5,656 |
28 | Gary Reichard | Templeton, CA 93465 | $4,926 |
29 | Brent Lamon | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $4,040 |
30 | Central Coast Equities | Bradley, CA 93426 | $3,750 |
31 | George K Nagano Trust | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $3,531 |
32 | Donn Bonnheim | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,500 |
33 | Cal Poly State University Foundat | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | $3,500 |
34 | Las Yeguas Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $3,000 |
35 | Mcmillan Generation Skipping Trus | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,974 |
36 | Morrison Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,723 |
37 | Douglas Goodan | Los Angeles, CA 90027 | $2,486 |
38 | James Maino | San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 | $2,075 |
39 | Philip R Hammond | Visalia, CA 93291 | $1,420 |
40 | John J Maino | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $1,287 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”