Total Commodity Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 560
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $24,917,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $285,621 |
22 | Hammond Vineyards Lp | Visalia, CA 93291 | $281,951 |
23 | Rj Livestock LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $279,661 |
24 | Okui Farms LLC | Oceano, CA 93475 | $262,762 |
25 | Guerra Ranch Corp | Morro Bay, CA 93443 | $250,000 |
26 | Carol Perrett | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $250,000 |
27 | H D Perrett | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $250,000 |
28 | Rick E Roberts | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $248,351 |
29 | Koch Mesa Nursery, Inc. Dba Euflo | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $245,747 |
30 | Jaureguy Family Trust No. 1 | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $244,178 |
31 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $240,793 |
32 | Cal Coast Orchids | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $235,823 |
33 | Massey Davis Livestock | Templeton, CA 93465 | $206,501 |
34 | Cagliero Vineyards Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $200,894 |
35 | Duane Baxley | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $197,859 |
36 | Pacific Sun Growers Greenhouses, | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $178,303 |
37 | Jeanette Holder-bartleson | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $177,518 |
38 | J B Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $169,493 |
39 | Simonin Livestock Gp | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $168,850 |
40 | Richard Shiffrar | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $145,539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”