Farm Subsidy information
Santa Barbara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 834
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $129,873,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Mesa View Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $500,000 |
| 42 | Monte J Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $500,000 |
| 43 | Westerlay Orchids LLC | Carpinteria, CA 93014 | $500,000 |
| 44 | Robert Campbell Ranches Inc | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $500,000 |
| 45 | Eat Sweet Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $500,000 |
| 46 | Cjj Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $500,000 |
| 47 | Red Blossom Sales Inc | Salinas, CA 93901 | $500,000 |
| 48 | Innovative Produce Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $497,961 |
| 49 | Oscar Sanchez Dba Ixtapa Farms | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $496,516 |
| 50 | Jmc Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $495,676 |
| 51 | La Fuente Farming Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $490,789 |
| 52 | Eugene & Gail Zannon Trust | Santa Barbara, CA 93121 | $490,679 |
| 53 | Armando Gonzalez | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $490,220 |
| 54 | Fred E Reyes | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $481,687 |
| 55 | Santa Barbara Exotics Inc | Carpinteria, CA 93014 | $480,606 |
| 56 | Valley Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $480,535 |
| 57 | Juan Ruiz | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $462,633 |
| 58 | Sierra Del Tigre Farms Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $456,532 |
| 59 | Kg Berry Farms LLC | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $449,609 |
| 60 | Doug Hermance | Santa Maria, CA 93456 | $444,955 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf