Emergency Conservation Program in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $1,088,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James K Stonier Jr | Livermore, CA 94550 | $446,028 |
2 | Willoughby Farms Inc | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $200,000 |
3 | Romero Cattle Co LLC | San Jose, CA 95109 | $110,645 |
4 | Redfern Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $78,318 |
5 | Robert Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $77,190 |
6 | Carlos J Saldivar | San Jose, CA 95127 | $34,003 |
7 | Perry Orchards Inc | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $30,422 |
8 | Robert Coffelt | Hollister, CA 95023 | $27,013 |
9 | Fisher Creek Land & Cattle LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $26,331 |
10 | Sally Miller | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $14,610 |
11 | Phillip Hurner | Alamo, CA 94507 | $13,508 |
12 | Naftzger Family Trust Dba N3 Catt | Gardena, CA 90248 | $6,860 |
13 | Borello Farms Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $5,484 |
14 | Clarie Telles | Farmington, CA 95230 | $5,079 |
15 | Biel Properties Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,498 |
16 | Carroll's Hay & Grain Inc | San Jose, CA 95112 | $4,017 |
17 | Giusepe Nino Campanella | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $3,328 |
18 | Friendship Farm | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”