Total Commodity Programs in Siskiyou County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 785
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Siskiyou County, California totaled $38,213,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crawford Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $1,873,497 |
| 2 | Staunton Farms, Lp | Malin, OR 97632 | $1,839,646 |
| 3 | Clt Logging | Grenada, CA 96038 | $1,742,956 |
| 4 | Staunton Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $1,046,606 |
| 5 | Mckoen & Son | Merrill, OR 97633 | $729,895 |
| 6 | Staunton Bros Partnership | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $677,866 |
| 7 | Daniel G Chin Dba Chin Farms | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $659,740 |
| 8 | P B M Farms | Dorris, CA 96023 | $587,794 |
| 9 | Porterfield Ranch | Dorris, CA 96023 | $552,911 |
| 10 | Timber Products Co Lp | Medford, OR 97501 | $522,695 |
| 11 | Stateline Farms, Inc Dba Cedar Po | Dorris, CA 96023 | $500,000 |
| 12 | Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker Brothers | Merrill, OR 97633 | $462,935 |
| 13 | Townley Bros | Montague, CA 96064 | $454,649 |
| 14 | Russell Peterson | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $412,094 |
| 15 | Peters Ranch | Montague, CA 96064 | $391,040 |
| 16 | Hale Dairy Inc. | Etna, CA 96027 | $385,724 |
| 17 | Ralphs Ranches Inc | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $377,773 |
| 18 | John And Robert Crawford Partnership | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $363,421 |
| 19 | Staunton Farms, Lp | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $363,196 |
| 20 | Richard Schader | Macdoel, CA 96058 | $328,157 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf