Emergency Conservation Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $297,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Danna & Danna Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $86,560 |
2 | Premiere Partners I | Champaign, IL 61826 | $19,740 |
3 | Bains & Smith | Rocklin, CA 95765 | $17,244 |
4 | Nock Brothers | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $12,915 |
5 | Robert & Katherine Bryant Rev Tru | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,844 |
6 | Central Land Co | Marysville, CA 95901 | $11,835 |
7 | Frank Giusti & Son | Robbins, CA 95676 | $11,044 |
8 | Premiere Partners III Limited Par | Champaign, IL 61826 | $10,620 |
9 | John Leon Sr | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $10,600 |
10 | Bakhshish Shoker Wrong Id | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $10,383 |
11 | Mike J De Ree | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $8,548 |
12 | Harbans Bath | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $8,500 |
13 | Rohleder Orchards | Meridian, CA 95957 | $8,352 |
14 | Madden Family Trust | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $7,750 |
15 | C And J Capaul Ranch | Meridian, CA 95957 | $7,019 |
16 | Philip La Rocca | Forest Ranch, CA 95942 | $6,127 |
17 | Matteoli Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $5,631 |
18 | M & J Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $5,530 |
19 | Kuldip Singh Atwal | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $4,760 |
20 | Daljit Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $4,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>