Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 253
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $461,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joe's Girls | Woodland, CA 95695 | $1,309 |
22 | Giusti Properties Ltd Ptner | Meridian, CA 95957 | $1,188 |
23 | Robert Derby | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $1,011 |
24 | Cheyenne Realty Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $974 |
25 | Scott Leathers | Woodland, CA 95695 | $899 |
26 | Donis Kay Leathers | Woodland, CA 95695 | $899 |
27 | J W H Farms | Novato, CA 94949 | $887 |
28 | Linneman Ranches | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $878 |
29 | Penning Bros | Gridley, CA 95948 | $747 |
30 | Richard Wilbur Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $672 |
31 | R & B Thiel | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $574 |
32 | Stephen & Debra Tarke Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $556 |
33 | R T Farming Co | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $541 |
34 | Hal W Haughey | Marysville, CA 95901 | $531 |
35 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $491 |
36 | Richard & Laurel Nelson Jt Vt | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $487 |
37 | Ralph Stegall | Colusa, CA 95932 | $486 |
38 | Lowrey Cattle And Farming | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $486 |
39 | Peacock/emery Joint Venture | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $477 |
40 | Blixen And Glaeser Farms | Davis, CA 95610 | $433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”