Farm Subsidy information
Sutter County, California
Total Subsidies in Sutter County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 552
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $14,893,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Satnam K Johl | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $44,731 |
| 22 | Suneel Sharma | Dixon, CA 95620 | $44,572 |
| 23 | Piara Gosal | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $42,122 |
| 24 | David L Swartz | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $42,091 |
| 25 | J & M Farms A Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $39,452 |
| 26 | One World Ranches LLC | La Jolla, CA 92037 | $39,370 |
| 27 | Triple H | Robbins, CA 95676 | $38,013 |
| 28 | Triple C Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $37,737 |
| 29 | Richland Hulling And Drying LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $37,602 |
| 30 | Brad Foster | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $36,151 |
| 31 | Gallagher Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $35,982 |
| 32 | Krehe & Krehe | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $35,920 |
| 33 | Johl Company | Marysville, CA 95901 | $35,029 |
| 34 | Richland Enterprises LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $34,843 |
| 35 | Bakshinder K Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $34,744 |
| 36 | Robert & Martha Devalentine Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $34,602 |
| 37 | Fruetel Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $34,242 |
| 38 | Park Farming | Meridian, CA 95957 | $33,971 |
| 39 | Tamita Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $33,562 |
| 40 | James T Sopwith Jr Dba Sopwith Fa | Sacramento, CA 95836 | $30,896 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf