Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Sutter County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $66,971 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan Dougherty Dba Prism Farming | Robbins, CA 95676 | $19,550 |
| 2 | Quad-h Ranches Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $5,756 |
| 3 | El Rio Farms | Trowbridge, CA 95659 | $4,795 |
| 4 | Dougherty Brothers | Robbins, CA 95676 | $4,637 |
| 5 | Garwood Ranch Inc | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $4,459 |
| 6 | Tim Moroni Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $4,225 |
| 7 | Mdm Farms | Sutter, CA 95982 | $4,225 |
| 8 | Matteoli Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $2,643 |
| 9 | F E R Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,435 |
| 10 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $2,143 |
| 11 | Jon L Matteoli Jr | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,070 |
| 12 | Martin & Susan Lund Farming Co | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $1,764 |
| 13 | Krehe & Krehe | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,700 |
| 14 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $1,540 |
| 15 | Tule Basin Farms LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $1,327 |
| 16 | Noah M Farnham | Woodland, CA 95695 | $1,035 |
| 17 | Richter Bros Inc | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $517 |
| 18 | Cole Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $377 |
| 19 | Roma Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $358 |
| 20 | Fairlee Family Ranch | Fort Bragg, CA 95437 | $344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf