Market Gains in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 659
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $47,782,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sjv Enterprises | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $1,400,889 |
2 | Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei | Robbins, CA 95676 | $1,390,934 |
3 | 6 River Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $783,544 |
4 | James & Claireen Tarke | Sutter, CA 95982 | $654,995 |
5 | Shannon Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $626,173 |
6 | Eastman Ranch | Woodland, CA 95776 | $588,709 |
7 | Van Dyke Brothers | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $541,763 |
8 | Nuevo Farms | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $533,673 |
9 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $506,452 |
10 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $488,514 |
11 | Blixen And Glaeser Farms | Davis, CA 95610 | $485,483 |
12 | Enterprise Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $423,190 |
13 | Alonso & Lytle & Ricci | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $413,177 |
14 | Lauppe And Son | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $408,788 |
15 | Moroni Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $403,052 |
16 | Matteoli Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $394,453 |
17 | Gmg Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $382,512 |
18 | El Rio Farms | Trowbridge, CA 95659 | $375,768 |
19 | Diamond J Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $370,426 |
20 | Fred & Evelyn Zielesch Partnershi | Woodland, CA 95695 | $354,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>