Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 314
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $7,518,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Penning Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $177,967 |
2 | K-four Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $164,601 |
3 | J & M Farms A Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $143,916 |
4 | A & B Rice Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $142,988 |
5 | Eastman Ranch | Woodland, CA 95776 | $138,969 |
6 | Penning Family Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $136,143 |
7 | Triple C Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $129,990 |
8 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $127,607 |
9 | Great Oak Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $118,311 |
10 | Brian J Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $118,294 |
11 | Sills Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $103,440 |
12 | Shannon Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $92,295 |
13 | Stephen & Debra Tarke Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $91,622 |
14 | Fruetel Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $90,315 |
15 | Michael Barosso | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $88,567 |
16 | Jack Alves | Woodland, CA 95695 | $86,492 |
17 | Debbie Carter | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $86,157 |
18 | Steven W Carter | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $86,106 |
19 | Michael Tarke | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $83,378 |
20 | M & H Farming Enterprises | Folsom, CA 95630 | $78,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>