Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 960
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $35,161,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dilbagh S Family Rev Trust A | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $309,598 |
22 | Harmon Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $298,810 |
23 | Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $297,340 |
24 | Royal Land LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $287,085 |
25 | Stephen And Debra Tarke Farms, Lp | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $282,667 |
26 | Oji Bros Farm Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $266,762 |
27 | Park Farming | Meridian, CA 95957 | $262,832 |
28 | Richard Taylor | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $250,000 |
29 | Hawn Ranch Co | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $244,345 |
30 | Enterprise Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $240,244 |
31 | G & A Pamma Orchards | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $239,430 |
32 | Matteoli Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $234,092 |
33 | Penning Family Farms Inc | Robbins, CA 95676 | $228,514 |
34 | One World Ranches LLC | La Jolla, CA 92037 | $226,986 |
35 | Bluebird Evelyn Blancuzzi | Hartville, MO 65667 | $224,209 |
36 | Didar Singh | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $221,858 |
37 | Thiara Global Inc | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $221,014 |
38 | Sun Valley Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $219,739 |
39 | Dale Investments LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $210,774 |
40 | Devalentine Orchards Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $209,118 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”