Farm Subsidy information
Tehama County, California
Total Subsidies in Tehama County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 364
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $26,720,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Christopher Dulaney | Dothan, AL 36301 | $1,622,329 |
2 | A P Esteve Farms Lp | Lodi, CA 95242 | $637,933 |
3 | North Valley Partners 1 | Orland, CA 95963 | $547,587 |
4 | Zuppan Dairy Partnership | Orland, CA 95963 | $509,243 |
5 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $500,000 |
6 | Haleakala Ranch LLC | Gerber, CA 96035 | $452,950 |
7 | J Garcia Olive Company LLC | Stockton, CA 95215 | $450,000 |
8 | Pacific Farms & Orchards Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $449,788 |
9 | Charles R Crain Jr | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $442,583 |
10 | Crane Mills Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $413,614 |
11 | Robert R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $405,199 |
12 | Andersen & Sons Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $389,596 |
13 | A&m Farming LLC | Vina, CA 96092 | $386,485 |
14 | M&s Properties | Gerber, CA 96035 | $377,739 |
15 | Holiday Ranches Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $369,787 |
16 | Long & Long Orchards Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $369,659 |
17 | Dutro Farms Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $362,808 |
18 | Pamela R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $342,037 |
19 | Daniel A Sutfin | Corning, CA 96021 | $337,767 |
20 | Tehama Angus Ranch Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $337,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>