Total Disaster Programs in Tehama County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,079
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $45,679,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $972,592 |
| 2 | Elpidio Tapia | Corning, CA 96021 | $858,928 |
| 3 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $757,396 |
| 4 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $743,520 |
| 5 | Juan Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $700,412 |
| 6 | Kenneth & Sheree Owens Family 1996 Revocable Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $690,352 |
| 7 | Richard P O'sullivan | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $669,170 |
| 8 | Rosalio Lopez Curiel | Corning, CA 96021 | $659,381 |
| 9 | La Conda Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $603,847 |
| 10 | Ferro Family Trust | San Rafael, CA 94901 | $542,711 |
| 11 | Felipe Ternero | Granite Bay, CA 95746 | $538,685 |
| 12 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $517,595 |
| 13 | Richard Rowland | Chico, CA 95973 | $508,322 |
| 14 | Dusty Debraga | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $476,706 |
| 15 | Antelope Creek Cattle Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $465,215 |
| 16 | Rick Arrowsmith | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $438,811 |
| 17 | Pablo Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $421,509 |
| 18 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $421,057 |
| 19 | Edwards Ranch | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $404,132 |
| 20 | Lpdb LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $401,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf