Farm Subsidy information
Tuolumne County, California
Total Subsidies in Tuolumne County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 205
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tuolumne County, California totaled $9,505,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kistler Santo Domingo Ranches Inc | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $2,334,839 |
2 | The Crook Revocable 1992 Trust | Sonora, CA 95370 | $520,319 |
3 | Lionudakis Firewood Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $461,656 |
4 | John R Grohl | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $319,096 |
5 | Dennis S Daoust | Sonora, CA 95370 | $311,859 |
6 | Scott Haydn-myer | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $309,072 |
7 | Robert S Brennan | Sonora, CA 95370 | $290,294 |
8 | Jesse D Riedel | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $286,688 |
9 | William C Ritts | Sonora, CA 95370 | $277,122 |
10 | Matt Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $267,441 |
11 | Price W Mailloux | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $266,685 |
12 | Jimmy I Mangante Revocable Trust | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $220,466 |
13 | Darlene Hodge | Sonora, CA 95370 | $217,834 |
14 | Lee R Brooks | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $204,096 |
15 | Helga Zuber | Sonora, CA 95370 | $138,411 |
16 | James Haydn-myer | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $115,410 |
17 | Sanguinetti Cattle Ranch LLC | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $108,339 |
18 | Dennis Seastrom | Coulterville, CA 95311 | $94,526 |
19 | William A Airola | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $91,576 |
20 | Amerine Turkey Farms | Escalon, CA 95320 | $86,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>