Farm Subsidy information
Yuba County, California
Total Subsidies in Yuba County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 265
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $14,289,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Danna Farms Inc | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $747,111 |
| 2 | Staas Farms Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $652,208 |
| 3 | Imperial Orchards LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $612,361 |
| 4 | Norene Ranches Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $594,308 |
| 5 | Sietse Tollenaar | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $555,145 |
| 6 | Rajinder & Paramdeep Chohan Ptshp | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $500,000 |
| 7 | Bhatti Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $460,327 |
| 8 | Johl Family Farms LLC | Marysville, CA 95901 | $404,970 |
| 9 | Smith Ranches B G M | Marysville, CA 95901 | $318,913 |
| 10 | Johl Orchards | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $229,229 |
| 11 | Kalkat Brothers Land Company | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $214,968 |
| 12 | John Rehermann | Marysville, CA 95901 | $213,464 |
| 13 | Jasmin K Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $177,632 |
| 14 | Kuldip Singh Atwal | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $162,840 |
| 15 | Golden Valley Fruit Packing | Marysville, CA 95901 | $158,695 |
| 16 | Johl Farms | Marysville, CA 95901 | $155,314 |
| 17 | Hallwood Fruit Company | Marysville, CA 95901 | $146,783 |
| 18 | Sukhdip Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $144,928 |
| 19 | Dalvir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $120,944 |
| 20 | Allen Brothers Land Company LLC | Chico, CA 95927 | $112,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf