Market Loss Assistance Program in Yuba County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 279
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $21,072,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | K-four Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $595,796 |
2 | District 10 Farms | Marysville, CA 95901 | $589,890 |
3 | Rainbow Farming | Marysville, CA 95901 | $539,175 |
4 | B & D Bradshaw | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $409,178 |
5 | Royal Valhalla Enterprises | Walnut Creek, CA 94597 | $313,016 |
6 | Rancho Rio Oso | Browns Valley, CA 95918 | $312,339 |
7 | Dhr Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $293,380 |
8 | Honcut Creek Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $278,155 |
9 | Alfaro Farms | San Francisco, CA 94122 | $275,780 |
10 | Inderbitzen Bros | Marysville, CA 95901 | $268,256 |
11 | A & R Bertolini Partnership | Marysville, CA 95901 | $267,948 |
12 | Hofman Ranch | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $260,902 |
13 | Cl Hofman Family Farm | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $251,564 |
14 | Saddleback Ranch | Del Mar, CA 92014 | $246,540 |
15 | Pacific Farms | Marysville, CA 95901 | $240,588 |
16 | Penning Bros | Gridley, CA 95948 | $220,736 |
17 | Black Diamond Farming | Del Mar, CA 92014 | $218,236 |
18 | Lucille Waltz And Douglas Waltz | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $217,398 |
19 | Quad Farms Partnership | Meridian, CA 95957 | $217,217 |
20 | Leak Ranch | Loomis, CA 95650 | $206,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>