Total Commodity Programs in Fambro Warehouse Company, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,888
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fambro Warehouse Company totaled $652,500,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J G Boswell Co | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $10,231,178 |
| 2 | Bowles Farming Company Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,840,626 |
| 3 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $7,806,342 |
| 4 | Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $7,760,940 |
| 5 | King Ranch Inc | Kingsville, TX 78364 | $6,475,947 |
| 6 | Red River Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $5,541,748 |
| 7 | Hansen Ranches | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $5,406,469 |
| 8 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $4,294,627 |
| 9 | Lewis Maiorino Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $3,690,171 |
| 10 | Sumner Peck Ranch Inc | Madera, CA 93638 | $3,287,592 |
| 11 | Gilkey Five | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $3,262,191 |
| 12 | Dublin Farms | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $2,696,661 |
| 13 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $2,648,429 |
| 14 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $2,579,931 |
| 15 | Murrieta Westlands Trust | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,537,732 |
| 16 | Fort Mojave Tribe | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $2,497,638 |
| 17 | Hughes Farming A Tenn Partnership | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $2,270,685 |
| 18 | Skalitsky Farms Ptn | Donna, TX 78537 | $2,089,303 |
| 19 | River Valley Ranches Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $2,010,294 |
| 20 | John & Vicky Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $1,980,905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf