Conservation Reserve Program in Colorado, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,913
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Colorado totaled $63,236,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joanne L Goodrich | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $102,132 |
22 | Edens And Son Partnership | Boone, CO 81025 | $100,219 |
23 | Gladys A Hodges Revocable Trust | Aurora, CO 80014 | $100,000 |
24 | American Agcredit Flca ** | Greeley, CO 80634 | $98,755 |
25 | Elda E Stavely | Haswell, CO 81045 | $97,563 |
26 | Reystead Family Partnership | Haswell, CO 81045 | $96,204 |
27 | Bank Of Colorado ** | Akron, CO 80720 | $95,765 |
28 | Rita Rueb - Rita Rueb Living Trust | Colorado Springs, CO 80917 | $92,269 |
29 | R M R Ranch Inc | Yuma, CO 80759 | $91,559 |
30 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $90,620 |
31 | Estate Of Carmen E Medlin | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $90,430 |
32 | Smelker Farms | Kit Carson, CO 80825 | $86,077 |
33 | Wilton Earle & Sons | Craig, CO 81625 | $81,614 |
34 | Colorado East Bank & Trust ** | Springfield, CO 81073 | $80,414 |
35 | J & L Farms Ptr | Eads, CO 81036 | $80,328 |
36 | Grimm-davis Farms | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $79,792 |
37 | Triple J Farms | Bennett, CO 80102 | $75,590 |
38 | Chris E Rundell | Lamar, CO 81052 | $75,110 |
39 | Colorado East Bank & Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $74,379 |
40 | Alice R Schnabel | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $74,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”