Total Commodity Programs in Colorado, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,084
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colorado totaled $506,770,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | M & J Dairy LLC | Kersey, CO 80644 | $1,122,193 |
22 | La Vaca Cattle Company | Littleton, CO 80120 | $1,105,848 |
23 | Worley Family Farms, LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $1,093,335 |
24 | Long Meadow Farm LLC | Greeley, CO 80631 | $1,047,189 |
25 | Marrs Milky Way Dairy LLC | Ault, CO 80610 | $1,039,380 |
26 | M & M Grain And Produce LLC | Center, CO 81125 | $1,035,218 |
27 | Ag Systems Management Lllp | Hasty, CO 81044 | $1,031,180 |
28 | Chapin Dairy LLC | Weldona, CO 80653 | $1,030,016 |
29 | Double W Farm Dairy Gp | Holyoke, CO 80734 | $1,025,477 |
30 | Mile High Dairy LLC | Longmont, CO 80504 | $1,017,133 |
31 | Dos Picos' Dairy LLC | Loveland, CO 80537 | $1,014,079 |
32 | Booth Land & Livestock | Lucerne, CO 80646 | $1,002,291 |
33 | Hillrose Dairy LLC | Hillrose, CO 80733 | $1,000,000 |
34 | Mike Harper Livestock, LLC | Eaton, CO 80615 | $1,000,000 |
35 | Blue Sky Farms Slv LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $987,687 |
36 | Ponderosa Partnership LLC | Center, CO 81125 | $981,098 |
37 | Three S Ranch | Blanca, CO 81123 | $966,416 |
38 | Mitchell Ag Production Flp | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $954,433 |
39 | Mcendaffer Cattle Co | Sterling, CO 80751 | $950,000 |
40 | Zapata Seed Company | Hooper, CO 81136 | $938,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”