Farm Subsidy information
Alamosa County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Alamosa County, Colorado, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 84
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alamosa County, Colorado totaled $4,877,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frontier Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $126,619 |
2 | Martinez Farms LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $59,882 |
3 | Mitchell Ag Production Flp | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $53,159 |
4 | Louie E Entz | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $50,000 |
5 | Farming Technology Corporation | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $50,000 |
6 | John D Kretsinger | Corpus Christi, TX 78412 | $48,356 |
7 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $44,177 |
8 | First Southwest Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $44,100 |
9 | Barbara Kruse | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $43,225 |
10 | Gail J Bowman Revocable Trust | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $42,727 |
11 | Ronald R Bowman Revocable Trust | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $42,727 |
12 | Van Treese Farms Inc | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $36,451 |
13 | Curto Family Farms LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $29,094 |
14 | Chiles Farms LLC | Hooper, CO 81136 | $28,372 |
15 | Zapata Partners LLC | Colorado Springs, CO 80928 | $27,117 |
16 | Rio Vega Ranch LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $26,896 |
17 | Sand Dune Farm, LLC | Hooper, CO 81136 | $21,700 |
18 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $21,350 |
19 | Scidmore Farms | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $21,326 |
20 | John Warner Iv | Clinton, IL 61727 | $21,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>