Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Colorado, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,302
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Colorado totaled $22,970,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farmers State Bank ** | Akron, CO 80720 | $219,148 |
2 | Oleo Acres | Flagler, CO 80815 | $213,121 |
3 | Pachner Agri Enterprises | Akron, CO 80720 | $200,236 |
4 | Daisy Lane Dairy Inc | Cope, CO 80812 | $166,142 |
5 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $149,766 |
6 | Golden Grain Farms Inc | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $148,548 |
7 | Craig Quick Farms Jv | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $146,305 |
8 | J & A Shook Farms Inc | Anton, CO 80801 | $146,178 |
9 | Mt Farms LLC | Cope, CO 80812 | $145,567 |
10 | Country Cruzin' | Yuma, CO 80759 | $145,554 |
11 | Jean May Wagers | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $140,495 |
12 | Anthony Schaffert | Otis, CO 80743 | $120,471 |
13 | Terri L Schaffert | Otis, CO 80743 | $120,471 |
14 | Mark Niebur | Akron, CO 80720 | $116,645 |
15 | Darin Corman | Otis, CO 80743 | $115,510 |
16 | Kenneth Cronk | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $114,377 |
17 | Hendrich Farms Inc | Akron, CO 80720 | $109,280 |
18 | Aaron Metzler | Otis, CO 80743 | $108,421 |
19 | Russell Dodge Brandon | Akron, CO 80720 | $105,274 |
20 | Premier Farm Credit Fica ** | Yuma, CO 80759 | $104,494 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>