Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Colorado, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,124
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Colorado totaled $606,101,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pine Ridge Ranch Ltd Lllp | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $1,673,372 |
22 | Jean May Wagers | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $1,581,855 |
23 | Birdsall Young Jr | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,552,406 |
24 | Randy Schoenecker | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,548,566 |
25 | Lee William O'neil | Brush, CO 80723 | $1,543,087 |
26 | Henry Harman | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,506,692 |
27 | Duke E Jaeger | Imperial, NE 69033 | $1,499,397 |
28 | William Harman | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,477,667 |
29 | David Lynn Callahan | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,457,323 |
30 | Varlen C Peterson | Rapid City, SD 57703 | $1,443,671 |
31 | Mark Bradney | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,434,792 |
32 | Vincent Friedly | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,403,188 |
33 | Earl F Jesse | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,403,069 |
34 | Joneal Young | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,394,373 |
35 | Peggy L Wright | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,365,794 |
36 | Palser Land Company | Otis, CO 80743 | $1,364,207 |
37 | L & M Farms Inc | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,355,670 |
38 | Monty Niebur | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,351,758 |
39 | William J Rodwell | Flagler, CO 80815 | $1,350,159 |
40 | Tom Niebur | Akron, CO 80720 | $1,346,779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”