Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Connecticut, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 92
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Connecticut totaled $1,318,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Boulder Knoll Farm | Cheshire, CT 06410 | $21,636 |
22 | Malerba's Farm | Norwich, CT 06360 | $20,524 |
23 | David Arno | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $20,193 |
24 | John Vaszauskas | Middlebury, CT 06762 | $18,825 |
25 | Bilander LLC | Pawcatuck, CT 06379 | $18,640 |
26 | Robert Futh Jr | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $18,023 |
27 | Matteo Valentino | North Haven, CT 06473 | $15,372 |
28 | Lewis S Borrelli | North Haven, CT 06473 | $15,372 |
29 | Groton Open Space Association Inc | Groton, CT 06340 | $15,265 |
30 | John Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $15,264 |
31 | George A Mccleary | Watertown, CT 06795 | $15,181 |
32 | Thomas S Scott | East Lyme, CT 06333 | $14,176 |
33 | Charles J Valentino | North Haven, CT 06473 | $13,478 |
34 | Blacey J Futtner Jr | East Hartford, CT 06118 | $13,203 |
35 | Thomas J Wall | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $13,047 |
36 | Fair Weather Acres | Rocky Hill, CT 06067 | $12,921 |
37 | Donald F Woods | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $11,686 |
38 | David B Lewis | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $10,776 |
39 | Forestland Management Alternatives LLC | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $9,748 |
40 | George W Wieting | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $9,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”