Miscellaneous Farm Programs in New London County, Connecticut, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in New London County, Connecticut totaled $382,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mackenziepaigellc | Stonington, CT 06378 | $112,760 |
2 | Driftwood Fisheries Inc. | New London, CT 06320 | $86,383 |
3 | Rivercenter Marine, LLC | Mystic, CT 06355 | $85,181 |
4 | Holmberg Orchards Inc | Gales Ferry, CT 06335 | $17,756 |
5 | R.c.g Fisheries Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $13,468 |
6 | Scott's Yankee Farmer - T Scott | East Lyme, CT 06333 | $12,954 |
7 | White Wave LLC | Waterford, CT 06385 | $12,031 |
8 | Santana Fishing LLC | Mystic, CT 06355 | $10,903 |
9 | James J Clark | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $6,298 |
10 | Conched Out Fisheries LLC | Stonington, CT 06378 | $6,041 |
11 | Millaras Piggery LLC | Quaker Hill, CT 06375 | $3,380 |
12 | Michael W Theiler | Waterford, CT 06385 | $3,352 |
13 | Goose Island Fisheries LLC | Mystic, CT 06355 | $3,026 |
14 | Capt'n Bait Fisheries LLC | Mystic, CT 06355 | $2,614 |
15 | Fishing Vessel Emily & Caitlyn LLC | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $2,132 |
16 | John Whittaker | Groton, CT 06340 | $2,077 |
17 | Robert F Russell | Waterford, CT 06385 | $543 |
18 | John Good | Norwich, CT 06360 | $304 |
19 | Beriah Lewis Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $265 |
20 | Robert G Williams | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $224 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>