Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,658
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Florida totaled $6,558,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dwight H Stephens | Summerfield, FL 34491 | $34,994 |
2 | H & W Dairy | Mc Alpin, FL 32062 | $29,133 |
3 | Weedman Farms Inc | Saint Augustine, FL 32092 | $18,586 |
4 | Earl M. Miller Jr. | Palatka, FL 32177 | $18,397 |
5 | P Kye Bishop | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $17,500 |
6 | Earl R Thompson | Baker, FL 32531 | $17,500 |
7 | Vale Of Alford Buffalo Ranch Inc | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $17,500 |
8 | T & W Groves Inc | Land O Lakes, FL 34639 | $17,500 |
9 | Wheeler Farms Inc | Lake Placid, FL 33862 | $17,500 |
10 | C And T Groves & Lands Inc | Lake Wales, FL 33898 | $17,500 |
11 | Holland Properties, Inc. | Winter Garden, FL 34777 | $17,500 |
12 | United American Citrus Ltd-delete | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 | $17,500 |
13 | Hwy 68 Partnership | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $17,500 |
14 | Wise Seed Company Inc | Frostproof, FL 33843 | $17,500 |
15 | Arthur Gladstone | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | $17,492 |
16 | S Douglas Zant | Gainesville, FL 32605 | $17,469 |
17 | Scarlet M Warner | Deland, FL 32720 | $17,225 |
18 | James K Warner | Deland, FL 32720 | $17,225 |
19 | George P Mason Jr | Lake Placid, FL 33862 | $17,172 |
20 | Gil Anderson | Westville, FL 32464 | $16,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>