Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in Florida, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,535

Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in Florida totaled $51,028,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Mcdaniel Ranch PartnershipClewiston, FL 33440$405,586
2Plantation Spice Growers NurseryGoulds, FL 33170$320,000
3Sunniland GrovesImmokalee, FL 34142$253,910
4Mcarthur FarmsOkeechobee, FL 34972$240,000
5Roadrunner CitrusTucson, AZ 85737$181,978
6Thomas S HammondVero Beach, FL 32963$160,000
7Robert J LindseyVero Beach, FL 32966$160,000
8Graves Brothers CompanyVero Beach, FL 32960$160,000
9Wescott Groves LLCFort Pierce, FL 34954$160,000
10Bernard A Egan Groves IncFort Pierce, FL 34946$160,000
11Kennedy Groves IncVero Beach, FL 32967$160,000
12Vero Producers IncVero Beach, FL 32968$160,000
13Greene Groves And Ranch LllpVero Beach, FL 32960$160,000
14Edsall Groves IncVero Beach, FL 32968$160,000
15Johnston Properties IncVero Beach, FL 32960$160,000
16Bonita Groves IncWest Palm Beach, FL 33414$160,000
17Emerald Grove LLCVero Beach, FL 32960$160,000
18Becker B-14 Grove LtdFort Pierce, FL 34981$160,000
19Riverland And Indian Sun LcWauchula, FL 33873$160,000
20Delray Linton Associates LLCBoca Raton, FL 33433$160,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag