Farm Subsidy information
Hillsborough County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,038
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $139,494,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakridge Fish Hatchery Inc %david | Plant City, FL 33565 | $2,097,695 |
| 2 | R P Co Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,644,211 |
| 3 | Farm Cut LLC | Plant City, FL 33566 | $1,450,000 |
| 4 | Hinton Farms Produce Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $1,421,693 |
| 5 | Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical Fis | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $1,419,492 |
| 6 | 5-d Tropical Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,233,510 |
| 7 | Parkesdale Farms Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $1,228,799 |
| 8 | John Goddard Produce Inc | Lakeland, FL 33815 | $1,213,088 |
| 9 | Goodson Farms Inc | Balm, FL 33503 | $1,174,480 |
| 10 | Ultra Farms LLC | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $1,120,145 |
| 11 | Mathis Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33563 | $1,107,200 |
| 12 | Liles Tropical Fish Inc | Ruskin, FL 33575 | $1,081,101 |
| 13 | Steve Simmons Aquatics Inc | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $1,049,841 |
| 14 | Strawberry Ranch Inc | Sydney, FL 33587 | $1,040,400 |
| 15 | Rawlins Tropical Fish Farm LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $1,010,789 |
| 16 | Sizemore Farms Inc | Mulberry, FL 33860 | $1,000,000 |
| 17 | E W Simmons Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33567 | $1,000,000 |
| 18 | Trinity Vegetable Co LLC | Elberton, GA 30635 | $1,000,000 |
| 19 | Under Ground Crop Consulting LLC | Plant City, FL 33567 | $997,703 |
| 20 | Mpb Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33563 | $995,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf