Farm Subsidy information
Indian River County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Indian River County, Florida, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $7,614,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fellsmere Joint Venture LLC | Fellsmere, FL 32948 | $679,131 |
| 2 | Vero Producers Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $497,364 |
| 3 | Spring Farm Wpb Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $236,484 |
| 4 | The Packers Of Indian River Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $224,780 |
| 5 | Estes Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $209,278 |
| 6 | Robert J Lindsey | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $208,193 |
| 7 | Banack Family Limited Partnership | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $183,335 |
| 8 | Estes Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $177,239 |
| 9 | Greene Groves And Ranch Lllp | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $173,863 |
| 10 | Indian River Exchange Packers Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $167,757 |
| 11 | Johnston Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $139,939 |
| 12 | Hammond Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32964 | $136,772 |
| 13 | Sebastian River Farms LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32964 | $133,583 |
| 14 | Pressley Ranch Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32969 | $128,023 |
| 15 | Ox Creek Ranch LLC | Port Salerno, FL 34992 | $126,738 |
| 16 | Treasure Coast Turf Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $105,509 |
| 17 | Riverbridge Farms LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $97,134 |
| 18 | Bernard Egan & Company | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $85,864 |
| 19 | Lambeth Citrus Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $69,621 |
| 20 | Crescent T S Cattle Co Inc | Scottsmoor, FL 32775 | $62,335 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf