Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Indian River County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 51
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $394,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas S Hammond | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $50,000 |
| 2 | White Face Acres Company LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $29,625 |
| 3 | Citrus From Indian River Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $24,544 |
| 4 | Estes Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $22,219 |
| 5 | Samuel Pryor | Wabasso, FL 32970 | $21,889 |
| 6 | I Coleman Davis | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $21,375 |
| 7 | W C Graves III | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $19,501 |
| 8 | Matthew Wayne Collier | Pompano Beach, FL 33060 | $17,502 |
| 9 | Jorge Latour | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $14,241 |
| 10 | X O Lisle | Kenansville, FL 34739 | $13,963 |
| 11 | The Packers Of Ind Riv Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $13,602 |
| 12 | Rollins Ranch | Atlanta, GA 30301 | $13,000 |
| 13 | Hearndon Brothers Cattle Co | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $11,080 |
| 14 | Lindsey Citrus Mgt Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34982 | $11,000 |
| 15 | Lillian G Allison | Sebastian, FL 32958 | $9,968 |
| 16 | Padgett Creek LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $8,188 |
| 17 | James L Rogers III | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $7,866 |
| 18 | Ralph W Sexton | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $6,977 |
| 19 | Triple S Cattle Company | Orlando, FL 32803 | $6,219 |
| 20 | Ronald L Rathbun Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $4,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf