Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in Indian River County, Florida, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 131

Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $3,305,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Robert J LindseyVero Beach, FL 32966$160,000
2Graves Brothers CompanyVero Beach, FL 32960$160,000
3Thomas S HammondVero Beach, FL 32963$159,096
4Banack Family Limited PartnershipVero Beach, FL 32961$158,800
5Johnston Properties IncVero Beach, FL 32960$149,626
6Heritage Land Co LLCVero Beach, FL 32961$145,320
7Lambeth Citrus LtdVero Beach, FL 32961$138,824
8Campbell Groves LLCFort Pierce, FL 34954$130,741
9Estes Groves IncVero Beach, FL 32960$88,210
10Mcdonnell Properties Of Indian RiVero Beach, FL 32963$81,035
11Shinn GrovesVero Beach, FL 32969$78,240
12Banyan Groves IncVero Beach, FL 32968$77,973
13The Fred R Tuerk Grove LLCVero Beach, FL 32961$77,191
14Premium Citrus IncFort Pierce, FL 34945$75,255
15Estes Citrus IncVero Beach, FL 32960$64,731
16Evans Properties IncVero Beach, FL 32963$63,520
17B M B Groves IncVero Beach, FL 32962$63,231
18Northwood LLCVero Beach, FL 32961$54,630
19Bernard A Egan Living TrustFort Pierce, FL 34946$51,272
20Riverfront Packing CompanyVero Beach, FL 32961$49,631

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag